Site Search
Recent Posts
- 10/28/24 THE METALS OF THE HEBREW BIBLE: GOLD AND SILVER
- 7/29/24 LESSONS FROM WALL FRAGMENTS AND A SCROLL
- 7/10/23 FUTURE TENTS: IF ONLY BALAAM COULD SEE ME NOW
- 5/8/23 WHAT THE TORAH AND TALMUD TEACH ABOUT CANCEL CULTURE
- 6/27/22 THE LAST CIVIL CONVERSATION ON ABORTION?
- 1/18/22 EXPLORING EINSTEIN AND KAPLAN, GOD AND SCIENCE
- 11/29/21 WHEN JEWS ARGUE IN THE SUPREME COURT ABOUT ABORTION
- 7/22/21 WHEN JUDAISM MEETS GLOBAL WARMING (PART 4/4)
- 7/12/21 WHEN JUDAISM MEETS GLOBAL WARMING (PARTS 1-3/4)
- 4/5/21 CONG. AGUDAT ACHIM EXPLORES “WHEN JUDAISM MEETS SCIENCE”
Most Viewed Content
Tags
Archives
Subscribe to receive new posts:
“a rare masterpiece”
– Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman, HUC
“careful research, passionate analysis, and good sense”
– Rabbi David Teutsch, RRC
“clear, engaging”
– Rabbi Geoffrey Mitelman, Sinai and Synapses
“a tremendous tome”
– Rabbi Wayne Dosick, SpiritTalk Live!
“an absolutely fascinating book”
– Rabbi Richard Address, Jewish Sacred Aging
“scholarly, judicious, and fair–minded . . . and very ‘readable’”
– Ronald W. Pies, MD
“a fresh way to explore Jewish topics . . . useful in teaching adults”
– Rabbi Gail Shuster–Bouskila
“A must read! . . . careful thought and such literary excellence”
– Rabbi Jack Riemer
Upcoming events
Posts Tagged ‘Kook’
Science and Judaism: Would That You Were Right, Rabbi Mitelman
Shortly before this blog was launched several months ago, Rabbi Geoffrey Mitelman of Beth El Synagogue in Northern Westchester, New York wrote an article for Huffington Post titled Why Judaism Embraces Science. See, www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-geoffrey-a-mitelman/why/can-judaism-embrace-s_b_880003.html. There Mitelman presented three “especially significant” reasons for his thesis.
At the outset, I recognize that Mitelman was writing a brief essay and not an academic paper, let alone an expansive book. And I also recognize that his audience was whoever was reading or may read the HuffPost blog and not a dedicated group of adult learners. Nevertheless, the three bases for Mitelman’s post, even if assumed to be correct, do not compel the conclusion for which they are mustered and they raise more questions than Mitelman answered in his piece. read more